Muhammad Amin Bughra : Renewal of ideas and preparation for the great national revolution

At the age of 22, when Amin Bughra graduated from madrassa and became a teacher, it was a time of dramatic change in the way of thinking and teaching of madrassas in the entire Muslim Turkic world, including in the lands of East Turkestan. During this period, conflicts between tradition, innovation, old-fashioned reform, rejection, acceptance, secularism, antiquity, and tensions were evident in almost all spheres of Uyghur society. As an early awakened warrior of his time, the young Muhammad Amin Bughra will also experience this intense conflict between the two currents. He writes in his History of East Turkestan and My Political Life: “At the age of 22, I finished my education and started teaching. I tried to innovate in the lessons and teaching methods of the madrassa. "It simply came to our notice then.

Indeed, it was no coincidence that the young Muhammad Amin Bughra, who, from an early age, had in his heart the thoughts of the future of his homeland, had been subjected to "hostility by the old conservative forces" as he put it. Mr. Abdujalil Turan, a publisher, emphasized that the opposition's opposition to the ideological and methodological innovations in the madrassas was not limited to Muhammad Amin Bugra, but also to his contemporaries, Abduqadir Damullam, and to reformers in other parts of the Turkic world.

Professor Alimjan Inayet also noted that the elites who have carried the torch of reform in any society throughout history have always faced opposition, and that it is impossible to avoid such opposition from the young Muhammad Amin Bughra, who at that time advocated ideological and methodological innovations in Hotan madrassas.

Dr. Noor Ahmed Kurban, Associate Professor of Theology at Çanakkale University, Turkey on March 18, has a different view. He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture, and that his confession had been obtained through torture.

Mr. Alimcan Inayet, a professor at the Turkish World Studies Institute at Ege University in Turkey, said that the differences between the ancients and the Jadids in the entire Muslim Turkic world of the early 20th century were widespread in all spheres; Earlier, Uyghur elites, such as Abduqadir Damullam and Muhammad Amin Bughra, argued that the reformist ideas of those years were not interrelated or contradictory, but interrelated and complementary. Drives.

Mr. Abdullah Oguz, who is currently writing his doctoral dissertation at the Turkish University of Istanbul, is the grandson of the late Dr. Yakup Bugra, the nephew of the late Muhammad Amin Bugra. He recently published a complete Turkish version of Muhammad Amin Bughra's book, History of East Turkestan, and has a deep understanding of the life of the Prophet. He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture, and that his confession had been obtained through torture.

Dr. Noor Ahmad Qurban, although there were some intellectual and methodological differences between the young Muhammad Amin Bughra and the scholars in Hotan in those years, he put aside these "differences" on the issue of the national revolution and sought the support of those from all walks of life. He reminds us that the great scholars, evolutionists, mystics, teachers, Taliban and others from all walks of life in Hotan took an active part in the national revolutionary movement that erupted in the early 1930s.

Finally, Mr. Abdujalil Turan, the head of Taklimakan Uyghur Publishing House in Istanbul, noted: It is well known that this issue has been dealt with in a very clever way and has led people from all walks of life to the path of the future national revolution. So it is conceivable that Muhammad Amin Bughra's difficulties in Hotan at that time did not reach the level of Abduqadir Damullam. "It simply came to our notice then.