How is the "Uyghur Genocide" linked to world-renowned businesses?

With the international outcry of evidence of the genocide of the Uyghurs, the world's attention has shifted to China, and the Uyghur issue has become an international issue on the world political scene. Although Russia's aggression on Ukraine seems to have eased the news of the Uyghur genocide to a lesser extent, in fact the Uyghur issue, as in the case of Ukraine today, is becoming increasingly important to global change and to human destiny.

To this day, the Uyghur genocide has been exposed internationally, and we have witnessed many internationally renowned products being linked to "Uyghur forced labor." For example, the Australian Center for Strategic Studies said in a report released in February 2020 that Geely Auto, General Electric, General Motors, Google, Hart Jack & Jones, Jaguar, Mercedes-Benz, Microsoft, Mitsubishi, Nike, Nokia, Panasonic, Puma, Samsung, SGMW Nearly 83 international companies, including Sharp, Siemens, Volkswagen, and Zara, have been linked to "forced labor."

The puzzling question here is when and how did these well-known branded products become associated with the Uyghur genocide? How many other businesses may be involved in the same Uyghur genocide?

In fact, after the end of the "Cultural Massacre" in 1976, and after the 11th Third Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee in 1978, it was decided to carry out economic reforms in China, but to maintain the system. This led to the implementation of the "reform and opening up" strategy, which laid the foundation for the greatest turning point in the history of Communist China and its subsequent cosmic development. However, the Chinese government has pursued a policy of reform only in the coastal areas where the Chinese population is concentrated, in the name of "some areas must be allowed to develop first" in order to ensure a comprehensive Chineseization policy within China.

The so-called "Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps" has been included in the list of those who enjoy the same open-air policies as the coastal Chinese regions. As a result, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps and the coastal areas have quickly become rich through the Chinese government's preferential policies, economic aid, and the influx of foreign investment, as well as the intensification of Chinese enterprises' foreign trade relations. But the Uyghurs, who have been forcibly deprived of reform, have turned to impoverishment, specifically "indirect impoverishment." This is because the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps not only enjoys the preferential policies and economic assistance of the Chinese government, but also enjoys all kinds of agriculture, industrial production, transportation, propaganda, medicine, trade and industry in the Uyghur region under these special privileges and economic assistance. Monopolized their fields. This situation has deprived the Uyghurs of development and the economy and deprived them of their livelihood. The various protests in the process can be said to have been entirely due to China’s unequal policies, as by the 1990s there was a stark difference in the economic income of Chinese and Uighurs in the Uighur region, with the Uighur-dominated southern Uighur region being the poorest in China. The northern regions of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps became the richest in China. It is at this point that the Chinese government pursues a so-called "poverty eradication" policy.

While this policy may seem to have been aimed at lifting impoverished Uyghurs out of poverty over the years, in reality the "reform and opening up" has seen the development of Chinese workers in the developed regions abroad, the decline of the labor force, the aging of the Chinese population, and the shortage of land in the coastal areas. As a result of the high inflow of foreign investment, the enterprises that are being built need a "new ground" for the development of certain environmental pollution, labor crisis, land crisis, etc. The implementation of the so-called "eradication of poverty" policy in 1994 was born out of the need to address these needs.

Indeed, the densely populated Uyghur region has been given special privileges in the so-called "Poverty Alleviation" policy in the southern Uyghur region, which has been identified as "severely impoverished areas." The "Assistance to Xinjiang" in 1996 and the "Large-scale Development of the West" in 1999 began with the aim of linking the Uyghur region with the most developed provinces in the coastal region and eradicating the Uyghur population. While depriving the Uyghurs of their administrative rights with the "Aid to Xinjiang" policy, the "Western Development" policy has completely plundered the natural resources of the Uyghurs through the tactic of "exchanging the resources of the developed regions with the money of the developed regions". The emergence of Uyghur forced labor is also directly linked to the extremely high Uyghur population in the fourth so-called 1990 census in 1990, with young and middle-aged people accounting for a large proportion of the population. Hu Angang, director of the Center for State Studies at Tsinghua University, also made the point in his book, "The Foundation of the Chinese Dream is the Ultimate Unity of the Chinese Nation."

Indeed, under the "aid to Xinjiang" and "western development" policies, China's production lines in the coastal areas have been relocated to the Uyghur region on a large scale, and the large number of foreign enterprises that have cooperated with them in the Uyghur region has also been linked to Uyghur forced labor.

As globalization accelerates, the 19 richest provinces and cities in China’s coastal areas are engaged in global education, trade, and all fields in a variety of ways, including “Sister-Friendly Urban Relations”, “International Chinese Expatriate Committee”, and “Confucius Institute”. Formed close contact.

At the 19th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party in 2017, Xi Jinping announced that China would lead the world in industrial production by 2025. The reason why Xi Jinping made this "great speech" is because of the huge trade network that China has formed between the Uyghur region and the world. For this reason, Xi Jinping undoubtedly convinced the world that another major plan, such as the so-called "One Belt One Road" strategy and the "New Silk Road Economic Belt" economic development plan, had given the world another plan, such as the United States' "Marshall Plan" in history. It was the countries that followed China.

However, At the same time as China's "friendship" with the West, there is an evil intent to destroy the democratic values ​​of the West, and the attention of the West has been raised to the highest level of the Uyghur issue, which has been ignored for years. The incident has led to the emergence of evidence that Western world-renowned companies in the West have linked their relationship with China to Uyghur forced labor. To date, it has been revealed that more than 100 well-known companies are involved in Uyghur forced labor, and as a result, Western countries have issued appropriate measures and laws, but it is not easy.

It is to be noted that the current Uyghur forced labor enterprises are not only foreign enterprises invested in the Uyghur region, but also enterprises that have been relocated from China's coastal areas in the name of "Assistance to Xinjiang and Development of the West" and all enterprises in these 19 provinces. May be related to forced labor.